vs 
Score vs Constant Contact
Constant Contact is an all-in-one marketing tool aimed at small businesses — but it owns the sending pipeline and bills by the number of contacts you store, which punishes large lists. Score sits above your SMTP providers, routing across Amazon SES, SendGrid, Mailgun and others with failover, and bills by volume sent rather than contacts stored.
- Volume-based pricing — pay per email sent, not per contact stored
- Large lists cost nothing to hold; the meter only moves when you send
- Route across multiple SMTP providers with weighted rules and failover
- Per-provider deliverability analytics and reputation alerts
- Built for high-volume and bulk sending as a first-class use case
- Beginner-friendly, all-in-one marketing for small businesses
- Event marketing, surveys, and social tools beyond email
- Large template library and guided onboarding
- Established brand with broad small-business support
| Feature | Score | Constant Contact |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Volume-based — $15/mo incl. 10K emails, then $0.30 per 1,000 | Per-contact monthly tiers — cost rises with list size [VERIFY: confirm current Constant Contact plan tiers and contact thresholds] |
| Sending model | Multi-provider routing layer with weighted rules and failover | Single, platform-owned sending pipeline |
| List-size economics | Large list costs nothing to hold; you pay when you send | Large list costs more every month regardless of sends |
| Built for | High-volume and bulk senders | Small businesses and first-time email marketers |
| Failover | Automatic failover to a backup provider when one degrades | No cross-provider failover — single point of failure |
| Deliverability visibility | Per-provider analytics with reputation alerts | Per-account analytics within Constant Contact only |
Constant Contact pricing and feature details verified from Constant Contact's site on June 23, 2026.
What is the best Constant Contact alternative for high-volume senders?
Score is a multi-SMTP routing and campaign platform that bills by volume sent, not contacts stored — it routes mail across your own providers like Amazon SES, SendGrid, and Mailgun with weighted rules and automatic failover. So a large list costs nothing to hold, and you only pay when you actually send, which is where Score pulls away from Constant Contact’s per-contact model.
Constant Contact is a friendly all-in-one marketing tool built for small businesses, bundling email with event, survey, and social tools. But it owns the sending pipeline and prices by the number of contacts you store — so as your list grows, your bill grows even if your sending doesn’t.
Why does per-contact pricing get expensive?
Per-contact billing charges you for every address on your list, whether or not you email it this month. For senders with large or fast-growing lists, that means paying to store contacts rather than to reach them. Score inverts that: holding contacts is free, and the meter only moves when you send. The same per-contact trade-off shows up with other all-in-one marketing tools like Klaviyo and ActiveCampaign, which also bill on stored contacts.
Where Score pulls ahead
Economics and resilience at volume. Volume-based pricing rewards large lists, and routing across multiple providers means no single point of failure and the freedom to send the bulk of your mail through the cheapest healthy provider at any moment — the same multi-provider model offered by a dedicated platform such as Ongage. Per-provider deliverability analytics and reputation alerts give you the visibility to act before inbox placement slips, so you can start routing across providers in minutes.
Frequently asked questions
Is Score a good Constant Contact alternative?
Score is a strong alternative for senders whose lists or volume have outgrown per-contact pricing. Constant Contact bills by the number of contacts you store and owns the sending pipeline, while Score routes across your own SMTP providers with failover and bills by volume sent. For large lists or high-volume sending, that shift from per-contact to per-email pricing is usually the deciding factor.
How is Score's pricing different from Constant Contact?
Constant Contact charges monthly tiers based on how many contacts you store, so costs climb as your list grows even if your send volume doesn't [VERIFY: confirm current Constant Contact tiers]. Score charges $15/month including 10,000 emails, then $0.30 per additional 1,000 emails — billed on what you send, not what you store. Holding a large list costs nothing until you actually email it.
Can I move my contacts and campaigns from Constant Contact to Score?
Yes. You can import your existing contacts and rebuild campaigns in Score, then route sending across your own SMTP providers. Because Score bills by volume sent rather than contacts stored, migrating a large list typically lowers your recurring cost.
Is Constant Contact better for small businesses?
Constant Contact is designed for small businesses and first-time marketers, with guided onboarding and extras like event and survey tools. Score is built for high-volume and bulk senders who want multi-provider routing, failover, and volume-based pricing rather than an all-in-one small-business suite.
Does Score handle deliverability monitoring?
Yes. Score reports deliverability per provider rather than only in aggregate, and raises reputation alerts so you can shift volume away from a degrading provider before it affects inbox placement.
See why teams pick Score over Constant Contact
Start sending in minutes with your own SMTP providers — pay only for the emails you actually send.