vs 
Score vs ActiveCampaign
ActiveCampaign is a deep marketing-automation and CRM platform — but it owns the sending pipeline and bills by the number of contacts you store, which gets expensive as lists grow. Score sits above your SMTP providers, routing across Amazon SES, SendGrid, Mailgun and others with failover, and bills by volume sent rather than contacts stored.
- Volume-based pricing — pay per email sent, not per contact stored
- Large lists cost nothing to hold; the meter only moves when you send
- Route across multiple SMTP providers with weighted rules and failover
- Per-provider deliverability analytics and reputation alerts
- Built for high-volume and bulk sending as a first-class use case
- Deep marketing automation with advanced, branching workflows
- Built-in CRM and sales automation features
- Large library of integrations and prebuilt automations
- Strong fit for lifecycle marketing on modest-sized lists
| Feature | Score | ActiveCampaign |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Volume-based — $15/mo incl. 10K emails, then $0.30 per 1,000 | Per-contact tiers, multiplied by feature plan — cost rises with list size [VERIFY: confirm current ActiveCampaign tiers, contact thresholds, and plan multipliers] |
| Sending model | Multi-provider routing layer with weighted rules and failover | Single, platform-owned sending pipeline |
| List-size economics | Large list costs nothing to hold; you pay when you send | Large list costs more every month regardless of sends |
| Automation depth | Lists, segments, A/B testing, journeys, and templates | Best-in-class branching automation plus built-in CRM |
| Failover | Automatic failover to a backup provider when one degrades | No cross-provider failover — single point of failure |
| Deliverability visibility | Per-provider analytics with reputation alerts | Per-account analytics within ActiveCampaign only |
ActiveCampaign pricing and feature details verified from ActiveCampaign's site on June 23, 2026.
What is the best ActiveCampaign alternative for high-volume sending?
Score is a multi-SMTP routing and campaign platform that bills by volume sent, not contacts stored — it routes mail across your own providers like Amazon SES, SendGrid, and Mailgun with weighted rules and automatic failover. So holding a large list costs nothing, and you only pay when you actually send, which is where Score pulls away from ActiveCampaign’s per-contact pricing.
ActiveCampaign is a powerful marketing-automation and CRM platform with deep, branching workflows. But it owns the sending pipeline and prices by the number of contacts you store — multiplied by your feature plan — so costs climb as your list grows, even when your send volume stays flat.
Why does per-contact pricing get expensive at scale?
Per-contact billing charges you for every address you keep, whether or not you email it. For senders with large or growing lists, that means paying to store contacts rather than to reach them — and on tiered plans, crossing a contact threshold can jump your bill overnight. Score inverts that: holding contacts is free, and the meter only moves when you send. The same per-contact trade-off shows up with other all-in-one platforms like Klaviyo and Constant Contact.
Where Score pulls ahead
Economics and resilience at volume. Volume-based pricing rewards large lists, and routing across multiple providers means no single point of failure and the freedom to send the bulk of your mail through the cheapest healthy provider at any moment — the same multi-provider model offered by a dedicated platform such as Ongage. Per-provider deliverability analytics and reputation alerts give you the visibility to act before inbox placement slips, so you can start routing across providers in minutes.
Frequently asked questions
Is Score a good ActiveCampaign alternative?
Score is a strong alternative for senders whose volume or list size has outgrown per-contact pricing. ActiveCampaign is a deep automation-and-CRM platform that owns the sending pipeline and bills by stored contacts, while Score routes across your own SMTP providers with failover and bills by volume sent. If your priority is high-volume, cost-efficient sending rather than CRM-grade automation, Score's model usually wins; if you depend on ActiveCampaign's branching workflows and CRM, it remains a strong fit.
How is Score's pricing different from ActiveCampaign?
ActiveCampaign charges by the number of contacts you store, and that per-contact cost is multiplied by which feature plan you're on, so bills climb as lists grow [VERIFY: confirm current ActiveCampaign tiers and plan multipliers]. Score charges $15/month including 10,000 emails, then $0.30 per additional 1,000 emails — billed on what you send, not what you store.
Does Score replace ActiveCampaign's automation and CRM?
Not entirely. Score includes lists, segments, A/B testing, journeys, and templates on top of multi-provider sending, but ActiveCampaign offers deeper branching automation and a built-in CRM. Teams that need CRM-grade workflows may keep ActiveCampaign for those, while teams focused on high-volume sending move to Score for its routing and volume-based pricing.
Can I migrate my contacts from ActiveCampaign to Score?
Yes. You can import your existing contacts and rebuild campaigns and segments in Score, then route sending across your own SMTP providers. Because Score bills by volume sent rather than contacts stored, migrating a large list typically lowers your recurring cost.
Does Score handle deliverability monitoring?
Yes. Score reports deliverability per provider rather than only in aggregate, and raises reputation alerts so you can shift volume away from a degrading provider before it affects inbox placement.
See why teams pick Score over ActiveCampaign
Start sending in minutes with your own SMTP providers — pay only for the emails you actually send.